EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-775/23, Bursa Română de Mărfuri: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 15 December 2023 – Bursa Română de Mărfuri SA v Autoritatea Națională de Reglementare în Domeniul Energiei (ANRE)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0775

62023CN0775

December 15, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/2283

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 15 December 2023 — Bursa Română de Mărfuri SA v Autoritatea Națională de Reglementare în Domeniul Energiei (ANRE)

(Case C-775/23, Bursa Română de Mărfuri)

(C/2024/2283)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bursa Română de Mărfuri SA

Defendant: Autoritatea Națională de Reglementare în Domeniul Energiei (ANRE)

Interveners: European Federation of Energy Traders, London Energy Brokers’ Association (LEBA), European Venues & Intermediaries Association (EVIA)

Questions referred

1.Does a national provision that requires the grant of a single licence for the operation of the electricity market constitute an infringement of the freedom of establishment laid down in Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union or of the freedom to provide services laid down in Article 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?

2.Should Article 35 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that national legislation requiring national and European electricity producers to offer for sale all the electricity available to them on the platforms managed by the only operator designated for national electricity market trading services constitutes a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on exports that cannot be justified on grounds of public security connected to the security of energy supply, in so far as such legislation is not proportionate to the objective pursued?

3.Should Articles 102 and 106(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, read in conjunction with Article 4(3) of the Treaty on European Union, be interpreted as meaning that national legislation which provides that, at the level of that Member State, one single licence may be granted for the purposes of carrying out intermediation services in respect of offers to sell and bids to buy electricity on the forward wholesale market, constitutes a restriction of competition for the purposes of those provisions?

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia