EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-665/21: Action brought on 18 October 2021 — Civitta Eesti v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0665

62021TN0665

October 18, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/51

(Case T-665/21)

(2021/C 490/62)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Civitta Eesti AS (Tartu, Estonia) (represented by: C. Ginter, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the defendant’s decision of 12 October 2021 (1) to reject the applicant’s tender in the procurement procedure MOVE/2020/OP/0008 ‘Legal, socio-economic and technical assistance in the fields of Energy and Mobility and Transport’, lot 5: ‘socio-economic assistance activities in the field of mobility and transport’;

annul every consequent, intended or related measure, including even measures as yet unknown taken by the defendant in lot 5 of the aforementioned procurement procedure, and, in particular, annul the tender evaluation reports and any contract entered to with the successful tenderer; and

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the defendant made a manifest error of assessment by rejecting the applicant’s tender and thus infringed Article 168 (6) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046. (2)

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union by rejecting the applicant’s tender and not considering the applicant’s explanations regarding the existence and integrity of its technical offer.

As notified to the applicant by the defendant’s letter no Ares (2021) 6214855 of 12 October 2021.

Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ 2018 L 193, p. 1-222).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia