- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-643/16: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 February 2018 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of American Express Company v The Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Treasury (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive (EU) 2015/2366 — Payment services in the internal market — Article 35(1) — Obligation to provide authorised or registered payment service providers with access to payment systems — Point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 35(2) — Inapplicability of that obligation to payment systems composed exclusively of payment service providers belonging to a group — Applicability of that obligation to three party payment card schemes that have entered into co-branding or agency arrangements — Validity)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CA0643
62016CA0643
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.4.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 123/5
(Case C-643/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive (EU) 2015/2366 - Payment services in the internal market - Article 35(1) - Obligation to provide authorised or registered payment service providers with access to payment systems - Point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 35(2) - Inapplicability of that obligation to payment systems composed exclusively of payment service providers belonging to a group - Applicability of that obligation to three party payment card schemes that have entered into co-branding or agency arrangements - Validity))
(2018/C 123/06)
Language of the case: English
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: The Queen, on the application of American Express Company
Defendant: The Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Treasury
Interveners in support of the defendant: Diners Club International Limited, Mastercard Europe SA
Operative part of the judgment
1.Point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 35(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC, must be interpreted as meaning that a three party payment card scheme that has entered into a co-branding agreement with a co-branding partner does not lose the benefit of the exception provided for by that provision and, therefore, is not subject to the obligation laid down in Article 35(1) of that directive in a situation where that co-branding partner is not a payment service provider and does not provide payment services within that scheme with respect to the co-branded products. However, a three party payment card scheme that makes use of an agent for the purposes of supplying payment services loses the benefit of that exception and, therefore, is subject to the obligation laid down in Article 35(1).
2.Consideration of the second question has revealed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Article 35 of Directive 2015/2366.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 78, 13.3.2017.