EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-11/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 May 2015 — Dupré v EEAS (Civil service — Staff of the EEAS — Member of the temporary staff — Article 98 of the Staff Regulations — Article 2(e) of the CEOS — Contract of employment — Grading — Plea of illegality of the vacancy notice — Post at grade AD 5 open to staff from national diplomatic services and to officials of grades AD 5 to AD 14 — Principle of correspondence between the grade and the post — Judgment by default)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FA0011

62014FA0011

May 18, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

29.6.2015

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/42

(Case F-11/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)

((Civil service - Staff of the EEAS - Member of the temporary staff - Article 98 of the Staff Regulations - Article 2(e) of the CEOS - Contract of employment - Grading - Plea of illegality of the vacancy notice - Post at grade AD 5 open to staff from national diplomatic services and to officials of grades AD 5 to AD 14 - Principle of correspondence between the grade and the post - Judgment by default))

(2015/C 213/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bruno Dupré (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the applicant’s contract in so far as it categorises him at grade AD 5 and to compensate him for the harm allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1)Dismisses the action;

2)Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 102 of 7/4/2014, p. 45.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia