- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-106/14: Action brought on 14 February 2014 — Universal Utility International v OHIM (Greenworld)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0106
62014TN0106
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.5.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 142/37
(Case T-106/14)
2014/C 142/48
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Universal Utility International GmbH & Co. KG (Kaarst, Germany) (represented by J. Mietzel, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
—annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 December 2013 in Case R 1658/2013-4;
—in the alternative, annul the contested decision in so far as it upheld the refusal of the application for the services in classes 35 and 39;
—in the further alternative, annul the contested decision in so far as it upheld the refusal of the application for the services in class 35;
—order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark Greenworld for goods and services in Classes 4, 35 and 39 — Community trade mark application No 11 616 588
Decision of the Examiner: Application refused
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed
Pleas in law:
—Breach of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94
—Breach of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94