- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-136/08: Action brought on 4 April 2008 — Aurelia Finance v OHIM (AURELIA)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0136
62008TN0136
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
JUDGMENT OF 6. 3. 2025 – CASE C-41/24 WALTHAM ABBEY RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION
24.5.2008
(Case T-136/08)
(2008/C 128/76)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Aurelia Finance SA (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by M. Elmslie, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
—Annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of 9 January 2008 in case R 1214/2007-1;
—Remit the applicant's application for restitutio in integrum to OHIM for reconsideration; and
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: A word mark consisting of the word AURELIA for various services in class 36 — application No 274 936
Decision of the OHIM: Refusal of the application for restitutio in integrum
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 78 of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the standard of due care required in connection with administrative renewals is lower than that for a party to proceedings before OHIM.
doc-end