I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case F-112/12) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
((Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to the European Union pension scheme of the pension rights acquired under national pension schemes - Decision on the crediting of pensionable years applying the new general implementing provisions relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly unfounded))
(2016/C 364/53)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: Florence Bouvret (Brussels, Belgium), Beata Stepien (Brussels, Belgium) and Daniel Wille (Mouscron, Belgium) (represented initially by D. de Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers, subsequently by D. de Abreu Caldas, J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers, next by J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers, and last by J.-N. Louis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by D. Martin and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, subsequently by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and last by G. Gattinara, acting as Agent)
Application for annulment of the decisions on the transfer of the applicants’ pension rights to the European Union pension scheme which apply the new general implementing provisions concerning Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 379 of 08/12/2012, p. 35.