- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-656/18: Action brought on 2 November 2018 — Jareš Procházková and Jareš v EUIPO — Elton Hodinářská (MANUFACTURE PRIM 1949)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0656
62018TN0656
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.1.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 4/40
(Case T-656/18)
(2019/C 4/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: Czech
Parties
Applicants: Hana Jareš Procházková a Antonín Jareš (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Kyjovský, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Elton Hodinářská a.s. (Nové Město nad Metují, Czech Republic)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade marks at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark MANUFACTURE PRIM 1949 — European Union trade mark No 3 531 662
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 September 2018 in Case R 1159/2017-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 60(2), Article 60(3), Article 64(5) and Article 70(2) of Regulation 2017/1001;
—Infringement of Article 27(4) and Article 55 of Regulation No 2018/625.