- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-377/14: Action brought on 30 May 2014 — Ezz v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0377
62014TN0377
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.7.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 245/27
(Case T-377/14)
2014/C 245/36
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz (Giza, Egypt) (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, R. Luff, A. Bailleux, Q. Declève, P. Vovan, S. Rowe and A. Yehia, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the action admissible and well-founded;
—annul Decision 2014/153, in so far as it extends until 22 March 2015 the restrictive measures directed against the applicant in Decision 2011/172/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt;
—order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those raised in Case T-375/14 Al Naggar v Council.