- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-31/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — adp Gauselmann v OHIM (Juwel)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0031
62016TN0031
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.3.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 106/41
(Case T-31/16)
(2016/C 106/48)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Juwel’ — Application for registration No 12 426 888
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 November 2015 in Case R 2571/2014-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Neither Article 7(1)(b) nor Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 is applicable.