EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-504/23 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 September 2023 — Terminal Ouest Provence v CINEA (Interim measures — Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Grant agreement — Arbitration clause — Application for interim measures — Lack of urgency)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TB0504

62023TB0504

September 25, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/661

13.11.2023

(Case T-504/23 R)

(Interim measures - Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) - Grant agreement - Arbitration clause - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

(C/2023/661)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Terminal Ouest Provence (Paris, France) (represented by: P. de Bandt, M.-R. Gherghinaru, L. Panepinto and Z. Irusta Ortega, lawyers)

Defendant: European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (represented by: I. Ramallo García-Pérez, N. Kopietz and P. Matczak, acting as Agents, and by S. Rodrigues, lawyer)

Re:

By its application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks (i) declaration, prima facie, that all the costs invoiced by its majority shareholder, Charmade, to the European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) are subcontracting costs within the meaning of the grant agreement ‘Grant Agreement — Project 101079665 — 21-FR-TG-TOP’ and are therefore fully eligible as such, and (ii) for CINEA to be prohibited from making decisions regarding the classification of those costs and, a fortiori, regarding their eligibility before the General Court has ruled on the action it brought on the basis of Article 272 TFEU.

Operative part of the order

1.The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2.The costs are reserved.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/661/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

* Language of the case: French.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia