- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-763/21: Action brought on 7 December 2021 — SE v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0763
62021TN0763
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.2.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 73/50
(Case T-763/21)
(2022/C 73/63)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: SE (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision dated 23 April 2021 to reject the applicant’s candidacy to the Junior Professional Pilot program (hereinafter ‘JPP program’);
—annul, insofar as necessary, the decision dated 27 August 2021 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 27 April 2021;
—order compensation of his material prejudice resulting from the loss of a chance to be reclassified as a temporary agent AD 5 as from 1 October 2021, as estimated in the application;
—order compensation of his material prejudice resulting from the loss of a chance to become a permanent official based on participation in internal competitions restricted to temporary agents at AD level, as estimated in the application;
—order the defendant to pay the entire costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging age discrimination, in violation of Article 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, Article 1d of the Staff Regulations and Article 10(1) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants.
2.Second plea in law, alleging abuse of mandate and/or lack of competence.
3.Third plea in law, alleging that the call for expressions of interest is illegal.