EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-255/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kecskeméti Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 27 May 2014 — Robert Michal Chmielewski v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Dél alföldi Regionális Vám- és Pénzügyőri Főigazgatósága

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0255

62014CN0255

May 27, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

8.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/11

(Case C-255/14)

2014/C 303/15

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Robert Michal Chmielewski

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Dél alföldi Regionális Vám- és Pénzügyőri Főigazgatósága

Questions referred

1)Does the amount of the fine imposed by Paragraph 5/A of Law XLVIII of 2007 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community (1) (‘the national implementing law’) fulfil the requirement in Article 9(1) of that Regulation, according to which the penalties laid down by national law must be effective, dissuasive and, at the same time proportionate to the infringement and to the objective pursued?…

2)Does Paragraph 5/A of the national implementing law not infringe, as a result of the amount of the fines it provides for, the prohibition on disguised restrictions on the free movement of capital in the Treaty on European Union and in Article 65(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?

(1) OJ 2005 L 309, p. 9.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia