- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-21/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 18 January 2017 — Catlin Europe SE v O.K. Trans Praha spol. s.r.o.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0021
62017CN0021
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.4.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 112/19
(Case C-21/17)
(2017/C 112/28)
Language of the case: Czech
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Catlin Europe SE
Applicant in the original proceedings: O.K. Trans Praha spol. s.r.o.
Question referred
Is Article 20(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure to be interpreted to the effect that a failure to notify the addressee of the possibility of refusing to accept the documents to be served, as provided for under Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents), and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 (‘the Service of documents Regulation’), gives grounds for a right on the part of the defendant (the addressee) to apply for review of the European order for payment under Article 20(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure (‘the European order for payment Regulation’)?
Language of the case: Czech
(1) OJ 2006 L 399, p. 1.
(2) OJ 2007 L 324, p. 79.
(3) OJ 2000 L 160, p. 37.