- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-258/12: Order of the General Court of 2 July 2013 — Mederer v OHIM — Katjes Fassin (SOCCER GUMS) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TB0258
62012TB0258
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.8.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 233/10
(Case T-258/12) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 233/17
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Mederer GmbH (Fürth, Germany) (represented by: O. Ruhl and C. Sachs, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Marten and R. Pethke, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmitz and C. Osterrieth, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 April 2012 (Case R 225/2011-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mederer GmbH and Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 217, 21.7.2012.