- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-595/10: Judgment of the General Court of 18 June 2014 — Cantina Broglie 1 v OHIM — Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (RIPASSA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark RIPASSA — Earlier national word mark VINO DI RIPASSO — Relative ground for refusal — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TA0595
62010TA0595
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 253/24
(Case T-595/10)(1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark RIPASSA - Earlier national word mark VINO DI RIPASSO - Relative ground for refusal - Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons))
2014/C 253/33
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Cantina Broglie 1 Srl (Peschiera del Garda, Italy) (represented by: A. Rizzoli, lawyer, allowed to replace A. Zenato)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (Verona, Italy)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the first Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 September 2010 (Case R 63/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between the Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona and Mr Alberto Zenato
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 September 2010 (Case R 63/2010-1);
2.Orders OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
(1)
OJ C 72, 5.3.2011.