- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases T-828/14 and T-829/14: Judgment of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — Antrax It v EUIPO — Vasco Group (Thermosiphons for radiators) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community designs representing thermosiphons for radiators — Earlier designs — Plea of unlawfulness — Article 1(d) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 — Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Principle of impartiality — Composition of the Board of Appeal — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Enforcement by EUIPO of a judgment setting aside a decision of one of its Boards of Appeal — Saturation of the state of the art — Date of assessment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TA0828
62014TA0828
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.3.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 95/7
(Joined Cases T-828/14 and T-829/14) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community designs representing thermosiphons for radiators - Earlier designs - Plea of unlawfulness - Article 1(d) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 - Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Principle of impartiality - Composition of the Board of Appeal - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Enforcement by EUIPO of a judgment setting aside a decision of one of its Boards of Appeal - Saturation of the state of the art - Date of assessment))
(2017/C 095/13)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Antrax It Srl (Resana, Italy) (represented by: L. Gazzola, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by M. P. Bullock, and subsequently by L. Rampini and S. Di Natale, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Vasco Group NV, formerly Vasco Group BVBA (Dilsen, Belgium) (represented by: J. Haber, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 October 2014 (Cases R 1272/2013-3 and R 1273/2013-3) relating to invalidity proceedings between Vasco Group BVBA and Antrax It.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeals;
2.Orders Antrax It Sarl to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Vasco Group, including those incurred by Vasco Group NV for the proceedings before the Board of Appeal in Cases R 1272/2013-3 and R 1273/2013-3.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.