- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases F-23/12 and F-30/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 September 2013 — Glantenay and Others v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Competition notice EPSO/AD/204/10 — Selection on the basis of qualifications — Elimination of candidates without specific examination of their degrees and diplomas and professional experience)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012FA0023
62012FA0023
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.3.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 71/31
(Joined Cases F-23/12 and F-30/12) (*)
(Civil service - Open competition - Competition notice EPSO/AD/204/10 - Selection on the basis of qualifications - Elimination of candidates without specific examination of their degrees and diplomas and professional experience)
(2014/C 71/59)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Jérôme Glantenay and Others (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)
Applicant: Marco Cecchetto (Rovigo, Italy) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision of the selection board for open competition EPSO/AD/204/10 not to admit the applicants to the next stage of the competition.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the decisions of the selection board for open competition EPSO/AD/204/10 to reject the applications of Mssrs Bonagurio, Cecchetto, Gecse, Glantenay, Gorgol, Kalamees and Skrobich and of Ms Venckunaite and Ms Załęska from the competition procedure without examining them in the context of the second stage of the selection based on qualifications laid down in the competition notice;
2.Dismisses the remainder of the actions in Cases F-23/12 and F-30/12;
3.Orders the European Commission to bear nine tenths of its costs and to pay those incurred by Mssrs Bonagurio, Cecchetto, Gecse, Glantenay, Gorgol, Kalamees and Skrobich and by Ms Venckunaite and Ms Załęska;
4.Orders Ms Cruceru to bear her own costs and to pay one tenth of the costs incurred by the European Commission.
(*) Language of the case: French.
OJ 2012 C 138, p. 35; OJ 2012 C 138, p. 36.