I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2015/C 406/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: Xabier Uribe-Etxebarría Jiménez (Erandio, Spain) (represented by: Esteve Sanz, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Núcleo de comunicaciones y control, SL (Tres Cantos (Madrid), Spain)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘SHERPA’– Community trade mark No 10 000 339
Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 July 2015 in Case R 1135/2014-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision.
—order OHIM and, where appropriate, the intervener to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Articles 63(1), 64(1) and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.
—Infringement of Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Rule 22 of Regulation No 2868/95.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation No 207/2009.