EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 26 November 1997. # T. Port GmbH & Co. v Commission of the European Communities. # Agriculture - Common organization of the markets - Bananas - Request for the issue of additional import licences - Action for declaration of failure to act - Procedure by default - No need to adjudicate. # Case T-39/97.

ECLI:EU:T:1997:184

61997TO0039

November 26, 1997
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61997B0039

European Court reports 1997 Page II-02125

Summary

Keywords

Actions for failure to act - Failure remedied after the action was brought - Action rendered devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate (EC Treaty, Arts 175 and 176)

Summary

The remedy provided for in Article 175 of the Treaty is founded on the premiss that the failure to act on the part of a Community institution enables an action to be brought before the Court of First Instance in order to obtain a declaration that the failure to act is contrary to the Treaty, in so far as it has not been remedied by the institution concerned. The effect of that declaration under Article 176 of the Treaty is that the defendant institution is required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment. Where the act whose absence constitutes the subject-matter of the proceedings was adopted after the action was brought but before judgment, a declaration by the Court to the effect that the initial failure to act is unlawful can no longer lead to the result envisaged by Article 176 of the Treaty. It follows that in such a case the subject-matter of the action has ceased to exist with the result that there is no longer any need to adjudicate.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia