I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2011/C 355/36
Language of the case: German
Applicant: ‘Rauscher’ Consumer Products GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by M. Stütz, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 July 2011 in Case R 2168/2010-1;
—Order OHIM to pay the costs.
Community trade mark concerned: figurative mark, representing a tampon, for goods in Classes 3 and 5
Decision of the Examiner: rejection of the application
Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 as the Community trade mark concerned has distinctive character