- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-518/11: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2014 — BTL Diffusion v OHIM — dm-drogerie markt (babyTOlove) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TB0518
62011TB0518
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.9.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 339/17
(Case T-518/11)(1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 339/19
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: BTL Diffusion (St Cloud, France) (represented by: A. Berendes, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel and D. Botis, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: C. Mellein and B. Beinert, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 July 2011 (Case R 883/2010-2) concerning opposition proceedings between dm-drogerie markt GmbH and BTL Diffusion.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.
(1) OJ C 355, 3.12.2011.