- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-648/13: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2015 — IOIP Holdings v OHIM (GLISTEN) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark GLISTEN — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TA0648
62013TA0648
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.3.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 96/18
(Case T-648/13)(<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark GLISTEN - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 096/22)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: IOIP Holdings LLC (Fort Wayne, United States) (represented by: H. Dhondt and S. Kinart, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 September 2013 (Case R 1028/2013-2), concerning an application for registration of the word sign GLISTEN as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders IOIP Holdings LLC to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.