I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark FORTIFY - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 027/63)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Hewlett Packard Development Company LP (Dallas, Texas, United States) (represented by: T. Raab and H. Lauf, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 June 2014 (Case R 249/2014-2), concerning an application for registration of the word sign FORTIFY as a Community trade mark.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Hewlett Packard Development Company LP to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
(1) OJ C 361, 13.10.2014.