I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2011/C 362/30
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Hultafors Group AB (Bollebygd, Sweden) (represented by: A. Rasmussen and T. Swanstrøm, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Società Italiana Calzature SpA (Milano, Italy)
—Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 August 2011 in case R 2519/2010-4; and
—Order the defendant to bear its own as well as the third party’s costs, including those incurred during the appeal and opposition proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark in black and white ‘Snickers’, for goods in classes 8, 9 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 3740719
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Italian trade mark registration No 348149 of the word mark ‘KICKERS’, for goods in classes 3, 14, 16, 18, 24, 25, 28, 32 and 33
Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition for all the contested goods
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly assumed that a risk of confusion exists between the trade mark application and the opposing trademark.