- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-202/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 26 April 2010 — Vion Trading GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CN0202
62010CN0202
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.7.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 209/12
(Case C-202/10)
()
2010/C 209/19
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Vion Trading GmbH
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas
Questions referred
1.Is the application by analogy of the limitation rule in Paragraph 195 BGB, in the version in force until the end of 2001, to claims for the repayment of wrongly paid export refunds incompatible with the Community-law principle of legal certainty?
2.Is the application of the 30-year limitation period in Paragraph 195 BGB in relation to the recovery of wrongly paid export refunds incompatible with the Community-law principle of proportionality?
3.If the reply to the second question is in the affirmative, is the application of a longer national limitation period within the meaning of Article 3(3) of Regulation No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests, which is determined on the basis of an emergency judicial power in particular cases, by way of judicial development of the law, compatible with the Community-law principle of legal certainty?
Language of the case: German.
* * *
(1) OJ 1995 L 312, p. 1.