- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
C-33/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège — Belgium) — V v Institut national d'assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants (Inasti), Securex Integrity ASBL (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Coordination of social security systems — Migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Transitional provisions — Article 87(8) — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 14c(b) — Worker exercising an activity as an employed and an activity as a self-employed person in different Member States — Derogations from the principle of a single applicable national legislation — Double affiliation — Application to be subject to the legislation applicable under Regulation No 883/2004)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0033
62018CA0033
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.8.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 263/10
(C-33/18) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Coordination of social security systems - Migrant workers - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Transitional provisions - Article 87(8) - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 14c(b) - Worker exercising an activity as an employed and an activity as a self-employed person in different Member States - Derogations from the principle of a single applicable national legislation - Double affiliation - Application to be subject to the legislation applicable under Regulation No 883/2004)
(2019/C 263/12)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: V
Defendant: Institut national d'assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants, Securex Integrity ASBL
Operative part of the judgment
Article 87(8) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 988/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that a person who, at the date of application of Regulation No 883/2004, exercised as activity as an employed person in one Member State and an activity as a self-employed person in another Member State, thereby being simultaneously subject to legislations applicable to social security in those two Member States, should not, in order to be subject to the legislation applicable under Regulation No 883/2004, as amended by Regulation No 988/2009, submit an express application to that effect.
(*)
Language of the case: French
* * *
(1) OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.