EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 May 2011. # Jager & Polacek GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark REDTUBE - Earlier unregistered national mark Redtube - Failure to pay the opposition fee within the prescribed period - Decision deeming the opposition non-existent - Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 - Protection of legitimate expectations - Rule 17 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Ex parte proceedings - Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 - Rule 18 of Regulation No 2868/95 - Legal nature of a communication from OHIM informing a party that an opposition has been found to be admissible - Rule of parallelism of procedural requirements and of the actus contrarius - Article 80 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. # Case T-488/09.

ECLI:EU:T:2011:211

62009TJ0488

May 12, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case T-488/09)

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark REDTUBE – Earlier unregistered national mark Redtube – Failure to pay the opposition fee within the prescribed period – Decision deeming the opposition non-existent – Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 – Protection of legitimate expectations – Rule 17 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 – Ex parte proceedings – Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 – Rule 18 of Regulation No 2868/95 – Legal nature of a communication from OHIM informing a party that an opposition has been found to be admissible – Rule of parallelism of procedural requirements and of the actus contrarius – Article 80 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Community trade mark – Registration procedure – Observation of third parties and opposition – Failure to pay opposition fee (Commission Regulation No 2869/95, Arts 8(3) and 8(4)) (see paras 38-41, 44-49)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2009 (Case R 442/2009-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Jager & Polacek GmbH and RT Mediasolutions s.r.o.

Information relating to the case

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

RT Mediasolutions s.r.o.

Community trade mark sought:

Word mark REDTUBE for goods and services in Classes 9, 38 and 41 – Application No 6096309

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Non-registered trade mark Redtube

Decision of the Opposition Division:

The notice of opposition is deemed not to have been entered

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal dismissed

Operative part

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Jager & Polacek GmbH to pay the costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia