I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark REDTUBE – Earlier unregistered national mark Redtube – Failure to pay the opposition fee within the prescribed period – Decision deeming the opposition non-existent – Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 – Protection of legitimate expectations – Rule 17 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 – Ex parte proceedings – Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 – Rule 18 of Regulation No 2868/95 – Legal nature of a communication from OHIM informing a party that an opposition has been found to be admissible – Rule of parallelism of procedural requirements and of the actus contrarius – Article 80 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009
Community trade mark – Registration procedure – Observation of third parties and opposition – Failure to pay opposition fee (Commission Regulation No 2869/95, Arts 8(3) and 8(4)) (see paras 38-41, 44-49)
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2009 (Case R 442/2009-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Jager & Polacek GmbH and RT Mediasolutions s.r.o.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
RT Mediasolutions s.r.o.
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark REDTUBE for goods and services in Classes 9, 38 and 41 – Application No 6096309
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
Non-registered trade mark Redtube
Decision of the Opposition Division:
The notice of opposition is deemed not to have been entered
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Jager & Polacek GmbH to pay the costs.