EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

HUTCHISON 3G UK / TELEFONICA UK

M.7612

HUTCHISON 3G UK / TELEFONICA UK
May 10, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EUROPEAN COMMISSION COMPETITION DG

Directorate R

Competition DG

OPINION

of the ADVISORY COMMITTEE on RESTRICTIVE AGREEMENTS AND

DOMINANT POSITION

given at its meeting of 27/04/2016

regarding a draft decision relating to

Case COMP/M.7612 HUTCHISON 3G UK / TELEFÓNICA UK

Rapporteur: SWEDEN

__________________________________________________________________________

1. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the notified transaction constitutes a concentration within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20.1.2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings.

2. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the notified transaction has an EU dimension pursuant to Article 1(2) of the Merger Regulation.

Market definition

3. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s definitions of the relevant product and geographic markets in the draft Decision.

4. In particular, the Advisory Committee agrees that the following markets should be distinguished:

a) Retail market for mobile telecommunications services in the United Kingdom. A minority disagrees.

b) Wholesale market for access and call origination services on public mobile telephone networks in the United Kingdom.

Competitive assessment

5. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's assessment that the notified transaction is likely to give rise to non-coordinated horizontal effects that would significantly impede effective competition on the retail market for mobile telecommunications services in the United Kingdom mainly due to the removal of the important competitive constraints that O2 and Three exerted upon each other, together with a reduction of the competitive pressure on the remaining competitors.

1 OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation") Commission européenne, DG COMP MERGER REGISTRY, 1049 Bruxelles, BELGIQUE Europese Commissie, DG COMP MERGER REGISTRY, 1049 Brussel, BELGIË

Tel: +32 229-91111. Fax: +32 229-64301. E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu.

AdCom M.7612 HUTCHIQON 3G UK / TELEFONICA UK dated 27/4/2016

6. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's assessment that the notified transaction is likely to give rise to non-coordinated horizontal effects that would significantly impede effective competition on the retail market for mobile telecommunications services in the United Kingdom due to the reduced competitive pressure exercised by one or both of BT/EE and Vodafone and the overall reduced level of industry-wide network investments resulting from the merged entity's network consolidation plans.

7. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's assessment that the notified transaction is likely to give rise to non-coordinated horizontal effects that would significantly impede effective competition in the wholesale market for mobile network access and call origination services on public mobile networks in the United Kingdom mainly due to the removal of the important competitive constraints that O2 and Three exerted upon each other, together with a reduction of the competitive pressure on the remaining competitors.

Remedy

8. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by the Notifying Party on 6 April 2016 pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Merger Regulation do not address the competition concerns identified by the Commission on the retail market for mobile telecommunications services in the United Kingdom.

9. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the commitments offered by the Notifying Party on 6 April 2016 pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Merger Regulation do not address the competition concerns identified by the Commission on the wholesale market for access and call origination services on public mobile networks in the United Kingdom.

10. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's conclusion that the notified transaction is likely to significantly impede effective competition in the internal market or in a substantial part of it.

11. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the notified transaction must therefore be declared incompatible with the internal market in accordance with Articles 2(2) and 8(3) of the Merger Regulation.

***

EUC

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia