- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-599/19: Action brought on 5 September 2019 — EM v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0599
62019TN0599
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.11.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 383/63
(Case T-599/19)
(2019/C 383/72)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: EM (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the present application admissible and well founded;
—annul the contested decision dated 31 October 2018, which was confirmed by the decision dated 24 May 2019 rejecting the applicant’s complaint;
—order the payment of compensation in respect of the material harm allegedly suffered, amounting to EUR 165 000, and compensation in respect of the non-material harm allegedly suffered, estimated at the sum of EUR 50 000.
—order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Articles 1 and 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, infringement of Articles 12 and 12a(3) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, a failure to observe the duty to provide assistance and misuse of powers.
2.Second plea in law, alleging breach of the duty of good administration, breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare of staff and a manifest error of assessment.