EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 June 1976. # Walter J. Riemer v Hauptzollamt Lübeck-West. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Finanzgericht Hamburg - Germany. # Cranberries. # Case 120-75.

ECLI:EU:C:1976:90

61975CJ0120

June 15, 1976
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61975J0120

European Court reports 1976 Page 01003 Greek special edition Page 00377 Portuguese special edition Page 00407

Summary

THE TERM ' BERRIES , FRESH ' USED IN HEADING 08.08 OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF MUST BE INTERPRETED AS NOT INCLUDING BERRIES WHICH HAVE BEEN FROZEN , EVEN FOR A SHORT TIME AND MERELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRANSPORTATION , AND WHICH , AT THE RELEVANT TIME , HAVE STARTED TO THAW OR HAVE THAWED OUT AGAIN.

Parties

IN CASE 120/75 REFERENCE TO THE COURT UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY BY THE FINANZGERICHT HAMBURG , FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING IN THE ACTION PENDING BEFORE THAT COURT BETWEEN

FIRMA WALTER J . RIEMER , HAMBURG ,

AND

HAUPTZOLLAMT LUBECK-WEST ,

Subject of the case

ON THE INTERPRETATION OF TARIFF HEADING 08.08 B ( BERRIES , FRESH , CRANBERRIES ) OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF ( REGULATION NO 950/68 OF THE COUNCIL , OJ L 172 , P . 1 , AS LAST AMENDED BY REGULATION NO 3000/75 OF THE COUNCIL , OJ L 304 , P . 1 ),

Grounds

1 BY ORDER OF 31 OCTOBER 1975 , RECEIVED AT THE COURT ON 5 DECEMBER 1975 , THE FINANZGERICHT HAMBURG REFERRED TO THE COURT UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY THE FOLLOWING QUESTION :

' MAY CRANBERRIES WHICH HAVE MERELY BEEN FROZEN FOR A SHORT TIME FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRANSPORTATION AND WHICH ARE TRANSPORTED WITHOUT REFRIGERATION AND HAVE ALREADY STARTED TO THAW OR HAVE THAWED OUT AGAIN BE CLASSIFIED AS FRESH BERRIES WITHIN THE MEANING OF TARIFF HEADING 08.08 B?

'

2 THE ORDER REFERRING THE CASE SHOWS THAT THIS QUESTION AROSE IN AN ACTION BETWEEN A GERMAN IMPORTER AND THE COMPETENT CUSTOMS AUTHORITIES OVER TWO CONSIGNMENTS OF CRANBERRIES WHICH , AS ' FRUIT , PRESERVED BY FREEZING ' , WERE CLASSIFIED UNDER HEADING 08.10 B OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF , ALTHOUGH THE IMPORTER CLAIMS THAT THEY CAME UNDER HEADING 08.08 B , AS ' BERRIES , FRESH ' .

THE QUESTION RAISED THEREFORE CONCERNS THE INTERPRETATION OF THE TERM ' FRESH ' APPEARING IN HEADING 08.08 IN RELATION TO THE TERM ' PRESERVED BY FREEZING ' IN HEADING 08.10 .

3 THE TARIFF DISTINGUISHES BETWEEN ' FRESH ' BERRIES REFERRED TO UNDER HEADING 08.08 AND FRUIT PRESERVED BY FREEZING , DRIED OR PRESERVED , UNDER HEADINGS 08.10 , 08.11 , 08.12 AND 20.06 .

IT FOLLOWS THAT THE TERM ' FRESH ' MUST BE INTERPRETED TO MEAN THOSE BERRIES WHICH ARE IN THE NATURAL STATE IN WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN HARVESTED AND WHICH HAVE NOT UNDERGONE ANY OF THE METHODS OF PRESERVATION OR TREATMENT MENTIONED .

4 THE INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE COURT SHOWS THAT THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BERRIES WHICH ARE SUBJECTED TO THE FREEZING PROCESSES UNDERGO CERTAIN IRREVERSABLE CHANGES AS A RESULT OF THIS VERY PROCESS , IN PARTICULAR TO THE STRUCTURE OF THE FLESH , WITH THE RESULT THAT THEY ARE NO LONGER IN THE NATURAL STATE , EVEN AFTER THEY HAVE STARTED TO THAW OR HAVE THAWED OUT .

5 THE APPROPRIATE REPLY TO THE QUESTION REFERRED IS THEREFORE THAT THE TERM ' BERRIES , FRESH ' USED IN HEADING 08.08 OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF MUST BE INTERPRETED AS NOT INCLUDING BERRIES WHICH HAVE BEEN FROZEN , EVEN FOR A SHORT TIME AND MERELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRANSPORTATION , AND WHICH , AT THE RELEVANT TIME , HAVE STARTED TO THAW OR HAVE THAWED OUT AGAIN .

Decision on costs

COSTS

6 THE COSTS INCURRED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , WHICH HAS SUBMITTED OBSERVATIONS TO THE COURT , ARE NOT RECOVERABLE .

AS THESE PROCEEDINGS ARE , IN SO FAR AS THE PARTIES TO THE MAIN ACTION ARE CONCERNED , IN THE NATURE OF A STEP IN THE ACTION PENDING BEFORE THE NATIONAL COURT , THE DECISION AS TO COSTS IS A MATTER FOR THAT COURT .

Operative part

ON THOSE GROUNDS ,

THE COURT ( SECOND CHAMBER )

IN ANSWER TO THE QUESTION REFERRED TO IT BY THE FINANZGERICHT HAMBURG BY ORDER OF 31 OCTOBER 1975 , HEREBY RULES :

THE TERM ' BERRIES , FRESH ' USED IN HEADING 08.08 OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF MUST BE INTERPRETED AS NOT INCLUDING BERRIES WHICH HAVE BEEN FROZEN , EVEN FOR A SHORT TIME AND MERELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRANSPORTATION , AND WHICH , AT THE RELEVANT TIME , HAVE STARTED TO THAW OR HAVE THAWED OUT AGAIN .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia