I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-138/13)(1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark VISCOTECH - Earlier national and international word marks VISCOPLEX - Evidence of the territorial extent and validity of an earlier international trade mark - Rule 19(2) and Rule 20(1) of Regulation (EC) 2868/95 - Relative grounds of refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 007/35)
Language of the case: Dutch
Applicant: Evonik Oil Additives GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany) (represented by: J. Albrecht, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: BRB International BV (Ittervoort, Netherlands)
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 December 2012 (Case R 1565/2012-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Evonik Degussa GmbH and BRB International BV
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Evonik Oil Additives GmbH to pay the costs.
OJ C 141, 18.5.2013.