- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-522/23: Order of the General Court of 4 October 2024 – Vossko v Council (Action for annulment – Commercial policy – Article XXVIII of the GATT – Agreement between the European Union and Brazil – Modification of concessions on tariff rate quotas as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the Union – Cooked poultry meat – Council approval decision on behalf of the Union – No individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TB0522
62023TB0522
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/7032
(Case T-522/23)
(Action for annulment - Commercial policy - Article XXVIII of the GATT - Agreement between the European Union and Brazil - Modification of concessions on tariff rate quotas as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the Union - Cooked poultry meat - Council approval decision on behalf of the Union - No individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)
(C/2024/7032)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Vossko GmbH & Co. KG (Ostbevern, Germany) (represented by: L. Harings, M. Jürgens and F. Jacobs, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: N. Brzezinski and B. Driessen, acting as Agents)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Council Decision (EU) 2023/1056 of 25 May 2023 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (OJ 2023 L 142, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no need to rule on the application to intervene of the European Commission.
3.Vossko GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Council of the European Union.
4.The Commission shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.
* * *
Language of the case: German.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7032/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—