EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-1030/23: Action brought on 10 October 2023 — Tiktok Technology v European Data Protection Board

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1030

62023TN1030

October 10, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2023/782

(Case T-1030/23)

(C/2023/782)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tiktok Technology Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, T. D’hulst, C. Monaghan, O. Tobin, P. Gallagher, D. McGrath, E. Egan McGrath, lawyers)

Defendant: European Data Protection Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

annul Binding Decision 2/2023 on the dispute submitted by the Irish SA regarding TikTok Technology Limited (Art. 65 GDPR) of 2 August 2023; and

order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the defendant exceeded its competence under Article 65(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. (1)

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed the applicant’s rights under Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant erred in law in finding that the Account Information Pop-Up and First Post Pop-Up infringed Article 5(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the procedure under Article 65(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 is incompatible with Articles 41, 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and with the Meroni principles and must be declared unlawful and invalid.

*

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/782/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia