I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(Action for annulment - European System of Financial Supervision - Investigation in respect of an infringement of EU law - Formal opinion of the Commission on actions necessary to comply with EU law - Article 17(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 - Actionable measure - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/4462)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s., (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: A. Börner, S. Henrich and S. Förster, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky, D. Triantafyllou and P. Vanden Heede, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Opinion C(2022) 6455 final of 13 September 2022 addressed to Národná banka Slovenska on actions necessary to comply with Directive 2009/138/EC.
The action is dismissed.
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the Slovak Republic’s application to intervene.
Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.
Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa, the Commission and the Slovak Republic shall each bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.
—
(1)
OJ C, C/2024/3619, 17.6.2024.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4462/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—