EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-685/15: Action brought on 26 November 2015 — Sulayr Global Service v OHIM — Sulayr Calidad (sulayr GLOBAL SERVICE)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0685

62015TN0685

November 26, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/67

(Case T-685/15)

(2016/C 038/91)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Sulayr Global Service, SL (Valle del Zalabi, Spain) (represented by: P. López Ronda, G. Macías Bonilla, G. Marín Raigal, and E. Armero Lavie, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sulayr Calidad, SL (Granada, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘sulayr GLOBAL SERVICE’ — Application for registration No 11 960 515

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2015 in Case R 149/2015-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision, in so far as it found a similarity between the services sought in class 40 and the services covered by the earlier mark in class 42 and consequently, a risk of confusion as regards those services;

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 60 of Regulation No 207/2009 and Rule 49(1) of Regulation No 2868/95.

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia