EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-710/22 P: Appeal brought on 17 November 2022 by JCDecaux Street Furniture Belgium against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 7 September 2022 in Case T-642/19, JCDecaux Street Furniture Belgium v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0710

62022CN0710

November 17, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.1.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/31

(Case C-710/22 P)

(2023/C 15/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: JCDecaux Street Furniture Belgium (represented by: A. Winckler, M. Malanda, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Clear Channel Belgium

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 7 September 2022 in Case T-642/19, JCDecaux Street Furniture Belgium v Commission;

grant the form of order sought by JCDecaux at first instance and annul Article 1 of Decision C(2019) 4466 of the European Commission of 24 June 2019 on State aid SA.33078 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) implemented by Belgium in favour of JC Decaux Belgium Publicité, in so far as it found that there was incompatible State aid in favour of JCDecaux in the performance of the 1984 contract, and Articles 2 to 4, in so far as they order the Belgian State to recover the aid from JCDecaux;

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In support of its appeal, JCDecaux submits that the General Court, in its judgment, adopted contradictory reasoning and erred in law in finding that the use by JCDecaux of certain advertising displays under the 1984 contract after their expiry date constituted an economic advantage, and distorted the facts in so far as it found that the advertising displays that were kept in place were covered by the 1999 contract on the basis of which ‘rent and taxes’ were due.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia