EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-476/15: Action brought on 19 August 2015 — European Food v OHIM — Société des Produits Nestlé (FITNESS)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0476

62015TN0476

January 1, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

12.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/37

(Case T-476/15)

(2015/C 337/42)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: European Food SA (Drăgăneşti, Romania) (represented by: I. Speciac, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘FITNESS’ — Community trade mark No 2 470 326

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 June 2015 in Case R 2542/2013-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision and remit the case to the Office in order to issue a decision in compliance with the Court’s ruling;

as a subsidiary, alter the contested decision and cancel CTM Fitness no 2470326;

order OHIM to pay the costs generated by the current proceedings.

Pleas in law

Infringement of rule 37(b)(vi), rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95 and Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009;

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia