I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2016/C 383/33)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Schrammek, C. Drzymalla, S. Risthaus, and J. Engberding, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Paalupaikka Oy (Iisalmi, Finland)
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘MAIN AUTO WHEELS’ — Application No 12 863 643
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 July 2016 in Case R 2189/2015-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.