EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-39/24: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 6 de Ceuta (Spain) lodged on 15 January 2024 – Justa v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0039

62024CN0039

January 15, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/3304

(Case C-39/24)

(C/2024/3304)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Justa

Defendant: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA

Questions referred

1.Does European legislation preclude the interpretation by the Supreme Court in relation to the arrangement fee, according to which the simple mention of the amount of the contract term in the mortgage instrument, and that the amount does not exceed the ceiling laid down, is sufficient for it to be held that the term is not unfair, in the light of Article 4(2) of Directive 93/13/EEC, (1) on the ground of a lack of transparency, even though that term contains no indication of content or time?

2.If the consumer is previously informed of the contract term in question and if that term is not understood to be included in the activity of bank lending, as indicated in Directive 2014/17/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, (2) and if it is considered to be unrelated to the remunerative interest, should invoices not be drawn up and should the services in question not be definitively specified before the charge is passed on to the consumer, and would such omission to do so not be contrary to European legislation by affecting the transparency of the contract term in question in a material sense?

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).

Directive 2014/17/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property and amending Directives 2008/48/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 60, p. 34).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3304/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia