EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-638/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2020 — European Commission v Romania (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2008/50/EC — Ambient air quality — Article 13(1) and Annex XI — Systematic and constant exceedance of the limit values for micro particles (PM10) in Zone RO32101 (Bucharest, Romania) — Article 23(1) — Annex XV — Exceedance period ‘as short as possible’ — Appropriate measures)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0638

62018CA0638

April 30, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/9

(Case C-638/18) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 2008/50/EC - Ambient air quality - Article 13(1) and Annex XI - Systematic and constant exceedance of the limit values for micro particles (PM10) in Zone RO32101 (Bucharest, Romania) - Article 23(1) - Annex XV - Exceedance period ‘as short as possible’ - Appropriate measures)

(2020/C 240/11)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Nicolae and E. Manhaeve, Agents)

Defendant: Romania (represented by: initially, A. Wellman, O.-C. Ichim, M. Chicu and C.-R. Canţăr, then, E. Gane, A. Wellman, O.-C. Ichim and M. Chicu, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Declares that Romania, on the one hand, by systematically and constantly failing, since 2007 and until 2016 at least, to comply with the daily limit values for concentrations of PM10 and by systematically and constantly failing, since 2007 and until 2014 inclusive, with the exception of 2013, to comply with the annual limit values for concentrations of PM10 in Zone RO32101 (Bucharest, Romania), has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13(1) of Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe, read in conjunction with Annex XI thereto, and, on the other hand, has failed with regard to that zone, since 11 June 2010, to fulfil its obligations under Article 23(1) of that directive, read in conjunction with Annex XV thereto, in particular the obligation laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 23 (1) of that directive to ensure that the exceedance period be as shorts as possible;

2.Orders Romania to pay the costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia