I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2021/C 88/58)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Precisis AG (Heidelberg, Germany) (represented by: I. Fowler and C. Stöber, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Easee BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark EASEE — Application for registration No 15 514 706
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 November 2020 in Case R 2948/2019-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant and the other party before the Board of Appeal in the event that it intervenes in the proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.