EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-628/21, Castorama Polska and Knor: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — TB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Directive 2004/48/EC — Measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights — Right of information — Locus standi — Need to establish the existence of an intellectual property right in advance)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0628

62021CA0628

April 27, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

19.6.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/13

(Case C-628/21, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) Castorama Polska and Knor)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property - Directive 2004/48/EC - Measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights - Right of information - Locus standi - Need to establish the existence of an intellectual property right in advance)

(2023/C 216/17)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: TB

Other parties to the proceedings: Castorama Polska sp. z o.o., ‘Knor’ sp. z o.o.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 8(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights

must be interpreted as meaning that, in proceedings concerning an infringement of an intellectual property right under that provision, the applicant must, for the purpose of a request for information under Article 8, provide any reasonably available evidence enabling the court seised of that request to satisfy itself with a sufficient degree of certainty that the applicant is the rightholder, by submitting evidence appropriate to the nature of that right and any special applicable formalities.

Language of the case: Polish

* * *

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia