EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 8 July 1998. # Eugénio Branco Ldª v Commission of the European Communities. # Taxation of costs. # Joined cases T-85/94 (92) and T-85/94 (122) (92).

ECLI:EU:T:1998:156

61994TO0085

July 8, 1998
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61994B0085

European Court reports 1998 Page II-02667

Summary

Keywords

Procedure - Costs - Taxation - Recoverable costs - Concept - Factors to be taken into consideration - Travel and subsistence expenses of persons other than the parties' lawyers - Fees of an economist - Conditions for reimbursement (Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Arts 91(b) and 92(1))

Summary

The Community judicature is not empowered to tax the fees payable by the parties to their own lawyers but it may determine the amount of those fees which may be recovered from the party ordered to pay the costs. Since Community law does not contain any provisions laying down a scale of fees, the Community judicature must assess, in its discretion, the relevant features of the case, taking into account the purpose and nature of the proceedings, their significance from the point of view of Community law, as well as the difficulties presented by the case, the amount of work generated by the dispute for the agents or advisers involved and the financial interest which the parties had in the proceedings.

Travel and subsistence expenses incurred by persons other than the lawyer of the applicant in question are recoverable only if the presence of those persons was necessary for the purpose of the proceedings. So far as the fees of an economist engaged by an applicant are concerned, such fees can be regarded as necessary expenses only if the involvement of the economist was necessary.

In view of the fact that, in fixing the recoverable costs, the Community judicature takes into account all the circumstances of a case up to the date on which it makes its ruling, it is unnecessary to make a separate ruling on the expenses incurred by the parties for the purpose of the proceedings on taxation of costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia