EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-684/24: Action brought on 30 December 2024 – Tone Watch v EUIPO –Munich (MUNICH10A.T.M.)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0684

62024TN0684

December 30, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/1240

(Case T-684/24)

(C/2025/1240)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Tone Watch, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. A. López Martínez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Munich, SL (Barcelona, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. – EU trade mark No 10 727 899

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 October 2024 in Case R 1271/2024-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision and return the proceedings to the relevant Board of Appeal of EUIPO, expressly stating that it must agree to the continuation of the appeal proceedings previously sought by Tone Watch, SL, and must complete the procedural formalities in connection therewith;

in the alternative, and only if the main claim is not granted, annul the contested decision and return the proceedings to the relevant Board of Appeal of EUIPO, stating that it must adjudicate on the continuation of the proceedings sought by Tone Watch, SL;

deliver a judgment upholding in full all the claims made in the application.

Plea in law

Infringement of EU law.

Breach of the principle prohibiting the denial of due process rights.

Failure to comply with the spirit of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and with the spirit of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, by adopting an exclusively literal interpretation in breach of EU law.

Infringement of Article 105 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1240/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia