- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-254/10 P: Order of the Court of 3 March 2011 — Centre de Coordination Carrefour SNC v European Commission (Appeal — Aid scheme in favour of coordination centres established in Belgium — Conditions of admissibility of an action for annulment — Concept of ‘interest in bringing proceedings’ — Res judicata)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CB0254
62010CB0254
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.8.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 252/8
(Case C-254/10 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Aid scheme in favour of coordination centres established in Belgium - Conditions of admissibility of an action for annulment - Concept of ‘interest in bringing proceedings’ - Res judicata)
2011/C 252/14
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Centre de Coordination Carrefour SNC (represented by: X. Clarebout, C. Docclo and M. Pittie, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Urraca Caviedes and J.-P. Keppenne, Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 — Case T-94/08 Centre de Coordination Carrefour v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed as inadmissible the applicant’s action seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2008/283/EC of 13 November 2007 amending Decision 2003/757/EC on the aid scheme implemented by Belgium for coordination centres established in Belgium (OJ 2008 L 90, p. 7) — Conditions of admissibility of an action for annulment — Concept of interest in bringing proceedings — Res judicata
Operative part of the order
The Court hereby:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders the Centre de Coordination Carrefour SNC to bear the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 246, 11.9.2010
* * *
Language of the case: French