EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-267/21: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 August 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie — Romania) — Uniqa Asigurări SA v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor, Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 56 — Supply of insurance services — Point of reference for tax purposes — Claims settlement services provided by third-party companies in the name and on behalf of an insurer)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0267

62021CA0267

August 1, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

24.10.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/18

(Case C-267/21) (*)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 56 - Supply of insurance services - Point of reference for tax purposes - Claims settlement services provided by third-party companies in the name and on behalf of an insurer)

(2022/C 408/20)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Uniqa Asigurări SA

Defendants: Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor, Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that claims settlement services provided by third-party companies, in the name and on behalf of an insurance company, do not come within the scope of the ‘services of consultants, engineers, consultancy bureaux, lawyers, accountants and other similar services, as well as data processing and the provision of information’ referred to in that provision.

*

Language of the case: Romanian.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia