I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-128/20 and T-129/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Applications for the EU word mark COLLIBRA and figurative mark collibra - Earlier national word mark Kolibri - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Right to be heard - Second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2021/C 462/44)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Collibra (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Renck, I. Junkar and A. Bothe, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Hans Dietrich (Starnberg, Germany) (represented by: T. Träger, lawyer)
TWO ACTIONS brought against two decisions of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 December 2019 (Cases R 737/2019-1 and R 738/2019-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Dietrich and Collibra.
The Court:
1.Joins Cases T-128/20 and T-129/20 for the purposes of the judgment;
2.Dismisses the actions;
3.Orders Collibra to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English
(OJ C 129, 20.4.2020)
* * *