EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-443/09: Action brought on 29 October 2009 — TTNB v OHIM — March (Tila March)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TN0433

62009TN0433

January 1, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/40

(Case T-443/09)

2009/C 312/66

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: TTNB SARL (represented by: J.-M.Moiroux, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Juan Carmen March (Madrid, Spain)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 August 2009 in Case R 1538/2008-2 and authorise the registration of the mark applied for;

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Tamara Taichman, the applicant’s predecessor

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Tila March’ for goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25 — application No 5 402 722

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Carmen March Juan

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the Spanish word mark ‘CARMEN MARCH’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 18, 24, 25, 35 and 38. The opposition was brought against registration of the goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25

Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: annulment of the decision of the opposition division

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the conflicting marks.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia