EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-411/12: Action brought on 14 September 2012 — Celtipharm v OHIM — Alliance Healthcare France (PHARMASTREET)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0411

62012TN0411

September 14, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/36

(Case T-411/12)

2012/C 366/73

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Celtipharm (Vannes, France) (represented by: P. Greffe and C. Fendeleur, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Alliance Healthcare France SA (Gennevilliers, France)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision corrigendum (of the decision of 2 May 2012) of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 June 2012 in Case R 767/2011-2.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Alliance Healthcare France SA

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘PHARMASTREET’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 35 — application for Community trade mark No 8 658 445

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National word mark ‘PHARMASEE’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 38, 42 and 44

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition is upheld in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal is granted and the decision of the Opposition Division is annulled

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia